Sex and Circumcision

American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):43-45 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are the effects of circumcision on sexual function and experience? And what does sex—in the sense related to gender—have to do with the ethics of circumcision? Jacobs and Arora (2015) give short shrift to the first of these questions; and they do not seem to have considered the second. In this commentary, I explore the relationship between sex (in both senses) and infant male circumcision, and draw some conclusions about the ongoing debate regarding this controversial practice.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
876 (#16,390)

6 months
103 (#42,771)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian D. Earp
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Circumcision, Autonomy and Public Health.Brian D. Earp & Robert Darby - 2019 - Public Health Ethics 12 (1):64-81.
Addressing polarisation in science.Brian D. Earp - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (9):782-784.
In defence of genital autonomy for children.Brian D. Earp - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (3):158-163.

Add more citations