Convention And Difference

Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 2 (3):116-121 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The claim that music is language may be oft repeated, but it remains wholly unenlightening unless a sufficient explanation of one of these terms has already been given. On the face of it, music is entirely dissimilar to natural language, at least when conceived functionally, the one being categorised primarily as an aesthetic object, the other first and foremost as a means of communication.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Units, text and language: an interdisciplinary approach.Mojsej G. Boroda (ed.) - 1995 - Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Music, philosophy, and modernity.Andrew Bowie - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Music & meaning.Jenefer Robinson (ed.) - 1997 - Ithaca [N.Y.]: Cornell University Press.
Lewis, Language, Lust and Lies.Max Kolbel - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):301-315.
Is Music a Language?Mark Abel - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (4):59-86.
Music and Language-Games.Joachim Schulte - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):173-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-26

Downloads
146 (#129,265)

6 months
53 (#86,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references