- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: An axiomatic approach
Artificial Intelligence 148 (1-2):219-260 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Corrigendum to “Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: an axiomatic approach” [Artificial Intelligence 148 (1–2) (2003) 219–260]. [REVIEW]Didier Dubois, Hélène Fargier & Patrice Perny - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (5-6):361-362.
Qualitative decision under uncertainty: back to expected utility.Hélène Fargier & Régis Sabbadin - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence 164 (1-2):245-280.
A Qualitative Linear Utility Theory for Spohn's Theory of Epistemic Beliefs.Phan H. Giang & Prakash P. Shenoy - 2000 - In C. Boutilier & M. Goldszmidt, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 16. Morgan Kaufmann.
A Semantic Approach to Non-Monotonic Conditionals.James Hawthorne - 1988 - In J. F. Lemmer & L. N. Kanal, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2. Elsevier.
Uncertainty modelling for vague concepts: A prototype theory approach.Jonathan Lawry & Yongchuan Tang - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (18):1539-1558.
Preferences Representable by a Lower Expectation: Some Characterizations. [REVIEW]Andrea Capotorti, Giulianella Coletti & Barbara Vantaggi - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (2-3):119-146.
Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Vol 3.D. Gabbay & P. Smets (eds.) - 1998 - Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Reasoning about general preference relations.Davide Grossi, Wiebe van der Hoek & Louwe B. Kuijer - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 313 (C):103793.
Contracting preference relations for database applications.Denis Mindolin & Jan Chomicki - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1092-1121.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
16 (#1,274,809)
6 months
4 (#976,702)
2020-12-22
Downloads
16 (#1,274,809)
6 months
4 (#976,702)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Preferences in AI: An overview.Carmel Domshlak, Eyke Hüllermeier, Souhila Kaci & Henri Prade - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1037-1052.
How to construct Remainder Sets for Paraconsistent Revisions: Preliminary Report.Rafael Testa, Eduardo Fermé, Marco Garapa & Maurício Reis - 2018 - 17th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NON-MONOTONIC REASONING.
Desirability foundations of robust rational decision making.Marco Zaffalon & Enrique Miranda - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 27):6529-6570.
A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model.Christophe Labreuche - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1410-1448.
A representation theorem for minmax regret policies.Sanjiang Li - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (1):19-24.
References found in this work
Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics.Sarit Kraus, Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor - 1990 - Artificial Intelligence 44 (1-2):167-207.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-9qhf6 uwo