- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: An axiomatic approach
Artificial Intelligence 148 (1-2):219-260 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Corrigendum to “Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: an axiomatic approach” [Artificial Intelligence 148 (1–2) (2003) 219–260]. [REVIEW]Didier Dubois, Hélène Fargier & Patrice Perny - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (5-6):361-362.
Qualitative decision under uncertainty: back to expected utility.Hélène Fargier & Régis Sabbadin - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence 164 (1-2):245-280.
A Qualitative Linear Utility Theory for Spohn's Theory of Epistemic Beliefs.Phan H. Giang & Prakash P. Shenoy - 2000 - In C. Boutilier & M. Goldszmidt (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 16. Morgan Kaufmann.
A Semantic Approach to Non-Monotonic Conditionals.James Hawthorne - 1988 - In J. F. Lemmer & L. N. Kanal (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2. Elsevier.
Uncertainty modelling for vague concepts: A prototype theory approach.Jonathan Lawry & Yongchuan Tang - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (18):1539-1558.
Preferences Representable by a Lower Expectation: Some Characterizations. [REVIEW]Andrea Capotorti, Giulianella Coletti & Barbara Vantaggi - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (2-3):119-146.
Qualitative Axioms of Uncertainty as a Foundation for Probability and Decision-Making.Patrick Suppes - 2016 - Minds and Machines 26 (2):185-202.
Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Vol 3.D. Gabbay & P. Smets (eds.) - 1998 - Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Reasoning about general preference relations.Davide Grossi, Wiebe van der Hoek & Louwe B. Kuijer - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 313 (C):103793.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
9 (#1,268,194)
6 months
4 (#1,005,419)
2020-12-22
Downloads
9 (#1,268,194)
6 months
4 (#1,005,419)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Preferences in AI: An overview.Carmel Domshlak, Eyke Hüllermeier, Souhila Kaci & Henri Prade - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1037-1052.
Desirability foundations of robust rational decision making.Marco Zaffalon & Enrique Miranda - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 27):6529-6570.
How to construct Remainder Sets for Paraconsistent Revisions: Preliminary Report.Rafael Testa, Eduardo Fermé, Marco Garapa & Maurício Reis - 2018 - 17th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NON-MONOTONIC REASONING.
A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model.Christophe Labreuche - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1410-1448.
A representation theorem for minmax regret policies.Sanjiang Li - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (1):19-24.
References found in this work
Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics.Sarit Kraus, Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor - 1990 - Artificial Intelligence 44 (1-2):167-207.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo