Private-sector research ethics: Marketing or good conflicts management? The 2005 John J. Conley lecture on medical ethics [Book Review]

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):115-139 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pharmaceutical companies are major sponsors of biomedical research. Most scholars and policymakers focus their attention on government and academic oversight activities, however. In this article, I consider the role of pharmaceutical companies’ internal ethics statements in guiding decisions about corporate research and development (R&D). I review materials from drug company websites and contributions from the business and medical ethics literature that address ethical responsibilities of businesses in general and pharmaceutical companies in particular. I discuss positive and negative uses of pharmaceutical companies’ ethics materials and describe shortcomings in the companies’ existing ethics programs. To guide employees and reassure outsiders, companies must add rigor, independence, and transparency to their R&D ethics programs

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Koncepcja odpowiedzialności społecznej firm farmaceutycznych.Marta Makowska - 2010 - Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 13 (2):95-104.
Dirty Money.Cynthia Jones - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (3):191-207.
Pricing Medicine Fairly.Robert C. Hughes - 2020 - Philosophy of Management 19 (4):369-385.
Medical Pharmaceuticals and Distributive Justice.Michael Boylan - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):30-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#73,846)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?