Taylor's refutation of epiphenomenalism

Journal of Critical Analysis 8 (1):23-28 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In "metaphysics" richard taylor argues that epiphenomenalism is implausible because it leaves open the possibility that human behavior occurs without the presence of mental events. in my paper i examine the sort of possibility involved and conclude that the logical possibility of "mind-less behavior" which epiphenomenalism must allow is an equal possibility for all competing theories of mind. thus, epiphenomenalism is seen to be no worse off in this respect than other theories and taylor's objection fails

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epiphenomenalism.Keith Campbell & Nicholas J. J. Smith - 1993 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What was Huxley's epiphenomenalism?Neil Campbell - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (3):357-375.
Is role-functionalism committed to epiphenomenalism?Brian P. McLaughlin - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):39-66.
Explanatory epiphenomenalism.Neil Campbell - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):437-451.
What's wrong with anomalous monism.Norman Melchert - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (May):265-74.
Is there a problem in physicalist epiphenomenalism?Amir Horowitz - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):421-34.
Anomalous monism and epiphenomenalism.Rex Welshon - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
In defence of qualia-epiphenomenalism.Volker Gadenne - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):101-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#256,426)

6 months
5 (#639,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references