Rival concepts of God and rival versions of mysticism

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):153-165 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a well known debate between those who defend a traditional (or classical) concept of God and those who defend a process (or neoclassical) concept of God. Not as well known are the implications of these two rival concepts of God in the effort to understand religious experience. With the aid of the great pragmatist philosopher John Smith, I defend the process (or neoclassical) concept of God in its ability to better illuminate and render as intelligible as possible mystical experience

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-18

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
60 (#259,995)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Dombrowski
Seattle University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature.William James - 1929 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Matthew Bradley.
The Varieties of Religious Experience.William James - 1903 - Philosophical Review 12 (1):62-67.
Eternity.Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (8):429-458.

View all 48 references / Add more references