Zygon 22 (2):195-212 (1987)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1987.tb00846.x |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
View all 49 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-243.
The Authority of the Scientific Rejection of Pseudo-Science.R. G. A. Dolby - 1989 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 9 (3):283-293.
The Authority of the Scientific Rejection of Pseudo-Science.R. G. A. Dolby - 1989 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 9 (5):283-293.
Similar books and articles
Educating the Educators.Massimo Pigliucci - 2002 - In R. Dawkins (ed.), Darwin Day Collection One: Single Best Idea, Ever. Tangled Bank Press.
The Problems with Creationism.Massimo Pigliucci - 2007 - In A. J. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (eds.), Scientists Confront Intelligent Design and Creationism. Norton.
The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science.A. A. Derksen - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):17 - 42.
Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World.R. G. A. Dolby - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Creationism.Jeffrey Koperski - 2006 - In Gary Laderman & Arri Eisen (eds.), Science, Religion, and Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Controversy. Sharpe Reference.
Can’T Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion?: Demarcation Revisited.Robert Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: A Look Into Freud’s Rhetorical Tool Box. [REVIEW]Athony A. Derksen - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):329-350.
How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom?Michael J. Reiss - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
The Premodern Sins of Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 732-747.
Is Intelligent Design Creationism?Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism.Robert T. Pennock - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):757-778.
Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism Philip Kitcher Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983. Pp. X, 213. $6.95.Brian S. Baigrie - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (3):588-.
Making Use of Creationism. A Case-Study for the Philosophy of Science Classroom.Michael Ruse - 1990 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 10 (1):81-92.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-02
Total views
101 ( #117,380 of 2,519,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,857 )
2010-09-02
Total views
101 ( #117,380 of 2,519,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
