The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism

Science & Education 19 (6-8):757-778 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

That Intelligent Design Creationism rejects the methodological naturalism of modern science in favor of a premodern supernaturalist worldview is well documented and by now well known. An irony that has not been sufficiently appreciated, however, is the way that ID Creationists try to advance their premodern view by adopting (if only tactically) a radical postmodern perspective. This paper will reveal the deep threads of postmodernism that run through the ID Creationist movement’s arguments, as evidenced in the writings and interviews of its key leaders. Seeing their arguments and activities from this perspective highlights the danger to science posed by both ID Creationism and radical postmodernism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-03

Downloads
277 (#75,949)

6 months
12 (#305,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Social constructionism and climate science denial.Sven Ove Hansson - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (3):1-27.
Is science metaphysically neutral?Iris Fry - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (3):665-673.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific Knowledge. A Sociological Analysis.Barry Barnes, David Bloor & John Henry - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):173-176.
The Origins of Scientific "Law".Jane E. Ruby - 1986 - Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (3):341.

View all 9 references / Add more references