Abstract
L.T.Hobhouse's concept of liberty--the concept at the heart of new liberalism--is based on T.H. Green's positive freedom. However, this paper demonstrates that the former has its own distinct nature and can be usefully defined as 'liberty as welfare'. In a context of renewed interest in the link between liberty and ability/personal development, scholars have looked back to Green's positive liberty. But the complex nature of latter has led to scholarly disagreement about its definitive features. The paper argues that Hobhouse's liberty has achieved what neither of Green's two liberties, juristic and true (or positive), have: accommodate concerns with personal development and social justice in a 'primary' concept of freedom. It is demonstrated that only Green's positive freedom, as opposed to his juristic freedom, internalises commitment to development and social justice, but for a number of reasons reviewed in the paper, it is not a primary concept. The first section of the paper examines and criticises Green's dismissal of juristic freedom and outlines the ways in which this concept could have been more viable. The second section demonstrates how Hobhouse's liberty achieves what Green's juristic freedom could have but did not--accommodate personal development and social justice in a concept of liberty that remains an opportunity concept
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberty: One Concept Too Many?Eric Nelson - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (1):58 - 78.
Berlin’s Two Concepts of Positive Liberty.Janos Kis - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
The Quality of Freedom.Matthew H. Kramer - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Language and Politics.[author unknown] - 1985 - New Vico Studies 3:219-220.
Liberty: All Coherence Gone?Preston King - 2000 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):25-48.
Freedom, Liberty, and Property.Jonathan Wolff - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (3):345-357.
The Shadow of Freedom Liberty and Liberation Between West and East, Subject and Environment.Roberto Terrosi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:795-800.
A Theory of Freedom.Matt Edge - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):368-387.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-07-05

Total views
35 ( #322,845 of 2,498,739 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,739 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes