Kant on Ethical Institutions

Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):30-55 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes the ethical-political dilemma in Kant’s work, sometimes expressed through the metaphor of the “crooked wood of humanity.” Kant separates external and internal freedom and the types of legislation each form of freedom requires (coercive and noncoercive). Yet, he also argues that corrupt political institutions adversely affect individual ethical development, and, reciprocally, corrupt inner dispositions of a populace adversely affect the establishment of just political institutions. I argue that a major way in which Kant addresses this vicious circle is through ethical institutions, that is, noncoercive public resources for articulating and disseminating the principles of the moral law. I discuss the idea of an ethico-civil society or ethical community formulated in the Religion as an ideal model for ethical institutions mediating the ethical and the legal-political in a noncoercive, progressive manner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-08

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
16 (#899,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy.Arthur Ripstein - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Moral faith and the highest good.Frederick Beiser - 2006 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 588-629.
Unsociable Sociability.Allen W. Wood - 1991 - Philosophical Topics 19 (1):325-351.
The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas.Leon Pompa - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):500-502.
Right and Coercion: Can Kant’s Conception of Right be Derived from his Moral Theory?Marcus Willaschek - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.

View all 12 references / Add more references