Contextualism, contrastivism, and X-Phi surveys

Philosophical Studies 156 (1):81-110 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I will here sharply oppose all the phases of the story Schaffer & Knobe tell. In Part 1 we will look at the supposed empirical case against standard contextualism, and in Part 2 we will investigate Schaffer & Knobe’s supposed empirical case for the superiority of contrastivism over standard contextualism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-23

Downloads
406 (#51,555)

6 months
18 (#152,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith DeRose
Yale University

References found in this work

Knowledge and practical interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Scorekeeping in a language game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Solving the skeptical problem.Keith DeRose - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
Contextualism and knowledge attributions.Keith DeRose - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):913-929.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2006 - Critica 38 (114):98-107.

View all 20 references / Add more references