Scorekeeping in a language game

Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (3):339.
The Puzzle of Experience. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Collins - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):246-248.
Judgment in Fiction.David Ryan - 2002 - South African Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):63-82.
Conversational scorekeeping and conditionals.Donald Nute - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (2):153 - 166.
Accommodation in a Language Game.Craige Roberts - 2015 - In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), A companion to David Lewis. Chichester, West Sussex ;: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 345–366.
Lewis, Language, Lust and Lies.Max Kolbel - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):301-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,165 (#11,688)

6 months
71 (#81,911)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David K. Lewis
PhD: Harvard University; Last affiliation: Princeton University

Citations of this work

Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (509):175-211.
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
Common ground.Robert Stalnaker - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):701-721.
The epistemic significance of disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.

View all 832 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How to refer with vague descriptions.Manfred Pinkal - 1979 - In Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from different points of view. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 32--50.

Add more references