‘Beyond A- and B-Time’ Reconsidered

Philosophia 38 (4):741-753 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a response to Clifford Williams’s claim that the debate between A- and B theories of time is misconceived because these theories do not differ. I provide some missing support for Williams’s claim that the B-theory includes transition, by arguing that representative B-theoretic explanations for why we experience time as passing (even though it does not) are inherently unstable. I then argue that, contra Williams, it does not follow that there is nothing at stake in the A- versus B debate.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-09

Downloads
104 (#172,830)

6 months
562 (#2,526)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Natalja Deng
Yonsei University

Citations of this work

Our Experience of Passage on the B-Theory.Natalja Deng - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (4):713-726.
The Invisible Thin Red Line.Giuliano Torrengo & Samuele Iaquinto - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101:354-382.
The Passage of Time as Causal Succession of Events.Avril Styrman - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy 120 (12):681-697.
Symmetric and asymmetric theories of time.Vincent Grandjean - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):14403-14426.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Real time II.David Hugh Mellor - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Real Time Ii.D. H. Mellor - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Temporal Experience.L. A. Paul - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (7):333-359.

View all 20 references / Add more references