Beyond “beyond a- and b-time”

Philosophia 34 (4):411-416 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article critically discusses Clifford Williams’ claim that the A-theory and B-theory of time are indistinguishable. I examine three considerations adduced by Williams to support his claim that the concept of time essentially includes transition as well as extension, and argue that, despite its prima facie plausibility, the claim has not been adequately justified. Williams therefore begs the question against the B-theorist, who denies that transition is essential. By Williams’ own lights, he ought to deny that the B-theory is a (realist) theory of time; and thus his claim that A-time and B-time do not differ significantly should be rejected.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empiricism, Time-Awareness, and Hume's Manners of Disposition.Adrian Bardon - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):47-63.
The Augustinian Impact on the History of Time.Daniel Collins-Cavanaugh - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:183-196.
The B-Theory of Time and the Fear of Death.Mikel Burley - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):21-38.
Time.Ned Markosian - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
‘Beyond A- and B-Time’ Reconsidered.Natalja Deng - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):741-753.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
131 (#97,232)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

‘Beyond A- and B-Time’ Reconsidered.Natalja Deng - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):741-753.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references