- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Special section: Darwinism and scientific practice in historical perspective [Book Review]
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Special section: Introduction to the special section.Stephen Behnke - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (2):103 – 104.
Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to neo-darwinism.A. J. Wells - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):911-912.
The uniformity of natural laws in Victorian Britain: Naturalism, theism, and scientific practice.Matthew Stanley - 2011 - Zygon 46 (3):536-560.
Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress.James A. Marcum - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.
Special issue: Darwin and Darwinism. Part One: Historical, Philosophical and Cultural Studies.David Rudge & Kostas Kampourakis (eds.) - 2010 - Springer (Science & Education).
Why should medicine consider a theory of practice? Introduction to the issue.Urban Wiesing & Jos V. M. Welie - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):199-202.
Special section: Introduction to the special section: Deception and observation.Marion K. Underwood - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):233 – 234.
Special section: Introduction to special section: Student paper competition.Stephen H. Behnke - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):351 – 352.
Special section: Darwinism and scientific practice in historical perspective: Guest editors' introduction.U. Deichmann & A. S. Travis - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):55-60.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-06-09
Downloads
34 (#467,440)
6 months
8 (#351,446)
2010-06-09
Downloads
34 (#467,440)
6 months
8 (#351,446)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Evolutionary developmental biology offers a significant challenge to the neo-Darwinian paradigm.Manfred D. Laubichler - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 199–212.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-cl5t5 uwo