Unwritten Doctrine of Pythagoras in Hermias of Alexandria

Peitho 13 (1):185-198 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Hermias’ commentary on Phaedrus (In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia), it is possible to identify several direct references to the philosophers and pre-Socratic doctrines, including Pythagoras. We point out to three references to Pythagoras in Hermias: (1) Pythagoras is characterized as an unwritten philosopher, (2) there is a special connection with the divinities and Muses, and (3) there is a special connection with the Phaedrus dialogue, revealed by the affinity between Pythagoras and Socrates. We show how the explicit references to Pythagoras in Hermias constitute a certain method of interpreting Platonism: as a philosophy manifested in writing, but which, at the same time, values the unwritten tradition, represented especially by Pythagoras and Socrates. We also demonstrate how the references translated and examined here reveal the image of this Neoplatonic Pythagoras of Hermias, an image which is not necessarily in tune with the oldest doxography, and which permits the reevaluation of Plato’s position as a philosopher who sought to combine unwritten doctrines with his explicit activity as a writer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nothing Rash Must Be Said.Hans Feichtinger - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):253-276.
Pythagoras and Early Pythagoreanism. [REVIEW]J. J. R. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (1):143-143.
Pythagoras and Early Pythagoreanism. [REVIEW]J. R. J. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (1):143-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-24

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations