Platonismo e aristotelismo a confronto sulla dialettica nel prologo degli «Scolî» di Proclo al «Cratilo»: riprese plotiniane e punti di convergenza con Siriano ed Ermia alla scuola platonica di Atene nel V sec. d. C [Book Review]

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9 (1):54-87 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his commentary on Plato’sCratylus, Proclus interprets the dialogue not as a mere work on logic or linguistics, but as having a full psychological and theological import.Late ancient Platonists had already proposed a similar reading for another Platonic dialogue,i.e.theParmenides. In that case too they rejected the logical interpretation, and aimed to find in the text the description of the hierarchy of reality, particularly of the highest beings. As a result, theParmenideswas seen as the accomplished expression of Plato’s theology.Proclus too draws a comparison between theCratylusand theParmenidesin order to stress their theological significance. He also contrasts Plato’s dialectic with Aristotle’s dialectic. Proclus’ interpretation of dialectic is best understood if it is compared to the doctrines of his master Syrianus and of one of his co-disciples,i.e.Hermeias, at the Platonic school of Athens in the 5th centuryad.Contrary to what is sometimes assumed, in this milieu Platonists were not always committed to the task of reconciling the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle. As it happens, they could strongly disagree with and even attack Aristotle, and side with Plato. In particular, they greatly valued Plato’s dialectic, which they viewed as the correct form of reasoning and at the same time as a theory of the utmost theological significance. On the other hand, Aristotle’s dialectic was considered as “bare” logic,i.e.as a mere set of logical rules and arguments with no specific contents.On the basis of a problematicCratylus’passage Proclus defends a theory of truth according to which not only propositions, but also names can be true or false. This allows him to view names as substitutes of propositions. This is particularly the case in the application of the four dialectical methods of definition, division, demonstration and analysis. Proclus’ approach arguably provides a basis—to pagan as well as Christian tradition—for the study of divine names as a part of theology, for the name of a god is held to reveal its attributes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alessandro di Afrodisia e Siriano sul libro B della Metafisica: tecnica e struttura del commento.Concetta Luna - 2004 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 15:39-79.
L'ambiguità Di Amore Nel Commento Al «fedro» Di Ermia Alessandrino.Angela Longo - 1998 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 9:21-34.
Siriano e i precedenti pre-aristotelici del principio della contraddizione.Angela Longo - 2004 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 15:81-97.
Il commento alla «Fisica» di Adamo di Bocfeld e un commento anonimo della sua scuola II.Silvia Donati - 1999 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 10:233-297.
Some Reflections on Continuity and Transformation of Aristotelianism in Medieval Natural Philosophy.Johannes Thijssen - 1991 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 2 (2):503-528.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-20

Downloads
21 (#676,185)

6 months
5 (#441,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angela Longo
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila

Citations of this work

Proclus.Christoph Helmig - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alessandro di Afrodisia e Proclo sulla dialettica.Davide Del Forno - 2019 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 40 (1):165-197.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prior Analytics. Aristotle & Robin Smith - 1989 - New York: Kessinger Publishing. Edited by Gisela Striker.
Cratylus. Plato - 1997 - In J. M. Cooper (ed.), Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett. pp. 101--156.
The Cratylus of Plato: a commentary.Francesco Ademollo - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thrasyllan platonism.Harold Tarrant - 1993 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references