- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Religion, science and natural philosophy: thoughts on Cunningham's thesis
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):377-386 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
A Reply To Peter Dear's ‘religion, Science And Natural Philosophy: Thoughts On Cunningham's Thesis’.Andrew Cunningham - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):387-391.
Religion is easy, but science is hard … understanding McCauley's thesis.James A. Van Slyke - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):696-707.
The Relevance of Hume's Natural History of Religion for Cognitive Science of Religion.Helen De Cruz - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (3):653-674.
Adam Smith: Philosophy, Science, and Social Science.D. D. Raphael - 1978 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 12:77-93.
Are science and religion natural enemies?Peter G. Woolcock - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):1.
Adam Smith on the ‘Natural Principles of Religion’.Ryan Patrick Hanley - 2015 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 13 (1):37-53.
Before Science: The Invention of the Friars' Natural Philosophy by Roger French; Andrew Cunningham. [REVIEW]George Molland - 1997 - Isis 88:532-532.
How the P rincipia Got Its Name: Or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously.Andrew Cunningham - 1991 - History of Science 29 (86):377-392.
Reply to Andrew Cunningham.Peter Dear - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):393-395.
You can say what you think: vindicating the effability of our thoughts.Delia Belleri - 2014 - Synthese 191 (18):4431-4450.
The Identity of Natural Philosophy. a Response To Edward Grant.Andrew Cunningham - 2000 - Early Science and Medicine 5 (3):259-278.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
82 (#203,418)
6 months
4 (#779,041)
2009-01-28
Downloads
82 (#203,418)
6 months
4 (#779,041)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What’s Wrong with Talking About the Scientific Revolution? Applying Lessons from History of Science to Applied Fields of Science Studies.Lindy A. Orthia - 2016 - Minerva 54 (3):353-373.
Teaching Darwinian Evolution: Learning from Religious Education.Tonie L. Stolberg - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):679-692.
Athanasius Kircher’s magical instruments: an essay on ‘science’, ‘religion’ and applied metaphysics.Koen Vermeir - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (2):363-400.
References found in this work
De-centring the ‘big picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science.Andrew Cunningham & Perry Williams - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Science 26 (4):407-432.
Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on The Identity and Invention of Science.Andrew Cunningham - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (3):365.
How the P rincipia Got Its Name: Or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously.Andrew Cunningham - 1991 - History of Science 29 (86):377-392.
Distance and velocity in Kepler's astronomy.Peter Barker & Bernard R. Goldstein - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (1):59-73.
Mixing metaphors: science and religion or natural philosophy and theology in early modern Europe.Margaret J. Osler - 1998 - History of Science 36 (1):91-113.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-bzrbm uwo