The Identity of Natural Philosophy. a Response To Edward Grant

Early Science and Medicine 5 (3):259-278 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Andrew Cunningham.Peter Dear - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):393-395.
Andrew Cunningham and Perry Williams, The Laboratory revolution in medicine.[author unknown] - 1994 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 47 (1):145-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
46 (#95,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on The Identity and Invention of Science.Andrew Cunningham - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (3):365.
The scientific revolution.John A. Schuster - 1989 - In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie & M. J. S. Hodge (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science. Routledge. pp. 217--242.
Philosophy and the Enterprise of Science in the Later Middle Ages.John E. Murdoch - 1974 - In Yehuda Elkana & Samuel Sambursky (eds.), The Interaction between science and philosophy. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.,: Humanities Press. pp. 51--74.

Add more references