Interpreting Anselm as logician
Synthese 40 (1):71 - 96 (1979)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1007/bf00413946
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate.
Back to Eternalism: A Response to Leftow’s “Anselmian Presentism”.Katherin Rogers - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
70 (#173,517)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2009-01-28
Downloads
70 (#173,517)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Backwards and forwards in the modal logic of agency.Nuel Belnap - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):777-807.
Anselm’s Logic of Agency.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 12 (1):248-268.
Interpreting Anselm as logician.Howard L. Dazeley & Wolfgang L. Gombocz - 1979 - Synthese 40 (1):71 - 96.
The rhetoric of prayer and argument in Anselm.Eileen Sweeney - 2005 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (4):355-378.
References found in this work
The logical form of action sentences.Donald Davidson - 1967 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 81--95.
Human Freedom and the self.Roderick M. Chisholm - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
