Scope note 31: Managed health care: New ethical issues for all

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):107-128 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers whether a physician is criminally liable for administering a dose of painkillers that hastens a patient's death. The common wisdom is that a version of the doctrine of double effect legally protects the physician. That is, a physician is supposedly acting lawfully so long as the physician's primary purpose is to relieve suffering. This paper suggests that the criminal liability issue is more complex than that. Physician culpability can be based on recklessness, and recklessness hinges on whether a physician has taken an unjustifiable risk of hastening death. The authors identify three conditions of justifiability. Their analysis helps to explain the distinction between euthanasia, which is legally banned, and the use of risky analgesics, which is permitted in limited circumstances.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Physician-Assisted Suicide: Where to Draw the Line?Ernlé W. D. Young - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):407-410.
Legalizing Physician-Aided Death.Alexander M. Capron - 1996 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (1):10.
Letters: Criminal Law, Pain Relief, and Physician Aid in Dying.N. L. Canter & G. C. Thomas - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1):103-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#991,618)

6 months
8 (#506,524)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?