Proving Quadratic Reciprocity: Explanation, Disagreement, Transparency and Depth

Synthese (9):1-44 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Gauss’s quadratic reciprocity theorem is among the most important results in the history of number theory. It’s also among the most mysterious: since its discovery in the late 18th century, mathematicians have regarded reciprocity as a deeply surprising fact in need of explanation. Intriguingly, though, there’s little agreement on how the theorem is best explained. Two quite different kinds of proof are most often praised as explanatory: an elementary argument that gives the theorem an intuitive geometric interpretation, due to Gauss and Eisenstein, and a sophisticated proof using algebraic number theory, due to Hilbert. Philosophers have yet to look carefully at such explanatory disagreements in mathematics. I do so here. According to the view I defend, there are two important explanatory virtues—depth and transparency—which different proofs (and other potential explanations) possess to different degrees. Although not mutually exclusive in principle, the packages of features associated with the two stand in some tension with one another, so that very deep explanations are rarely transparent, and vice versa. After developing the theory of depth and transparency and applying it to the case of quadratic reciprocity, I draw some morals about the nature of mathematical explanation.

Similar books and articles

Quadratic forms in models of IΔ0+ Ω1. I.Paola D’Aquino & Angus Macintyre - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 148 (1):31-48.
Quadratic forms in models of I Δ 0 + Ω 1. I.Paola D’Aquino & Angus Macintyre - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 148 (1-3):31-48.
Explanation in Mathematical Practice.David Sandborg - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Mathematical Explanations that are Not Proofs.Marc Lange - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (6):1285-1302.
Explanatory Depth.Brad Weslake - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (2):273-294.
What inductive explanations could not be.John Dougherty - 2018 - Synthese 195 (12):5473-5483.
Depth and Explanation in Mathematics.Marc Lange - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (2):196-214.


Added to PP

597 (#28,252)

6 months
132 (#25,122)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William D'Alessandro
University of Oxford

References found in this work

Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world.Philip Kitcher - 1989 - In Philip Kitcher & Wesley Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 410-505.
The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice.Paolo Mancosu (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding.J. D. Trout - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):212-233.
The Role of Explanation in Understanding.Kareem Khalifa - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):161-187.

View all 37 references / Add more references