Authors
Anton Killin
Australian National University
Adrian Currie
Cambridge University
Abstract
The scientific investigation of music requires contributions from a diverse array of disciplines. Given the diverse methodologies, interests and research targets of the disciplines involved, we argue that there is a plurality of legitimate research questions about music, necessitating a focus on integration. In light of this we recommend a pluralistic conception of music—that there is no unitary definition divorced from some discipline, research question or context. This has important implications for how the scientific study of music ought to proceed: we show that some definitions are complementary, that is, they reflect different research interests and ought to be retained and, where possible, integrated, while others are antagonistic, they represent real empirical disagreement about music’s nature and how to account for it. We illustrate this in discussion of two related issues: questions about the evolutionary function of music, and questions of the innateness of music. These debates have been, in light of pluralism, misconceived. We suggest that, in both cases, scientists ought to proceed by constructing integrated models which take into account the dynamic interaction between different aspects of music
Keywords Definitions of music  Musicality  Pluralism  Musical cognition  Evolution of music
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-015-0123-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conceptual Fragmentation and the Rise of Eliminativism.Henry Taylor & Peter Vickers - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):17-40.
Configurations of Pluralisms. Navigating Polyphony and Diversity in Philosophy and Beyond.Machiel Keestra - 2022 - In Keith Stenning & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Rules, Regularities, Randomness. Festschrift for Michiel van Lambalgen. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation. pp. 87-99.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Music & Meaning.Jenefer Robinson (ed.) - 1997 - Cornell University Press.
Philosophy and Music.Jerrold Levinson - 2009 - Topoi 28 (2):119-123.
The Philosophy of Music.Andrew Kania - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Musical Perceptions.Rita Aiello & John A. Sloboda (eds.) - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes.J. R. Matyja & A. Schiavio - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (3):351-357.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-26

Total views
55 ( #204,826 of 2,499,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,202 of 2,499,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes