Are Audit-related Ethical Decisions Dependent upon Mood?

Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):191-209 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study explores the impact of mood on individuals’ ethical decision-making processes through the Graham [Graham, J. W.: 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 1–52] model of Principled Organizational Dissent. In particular, the research addresses how an individual’s mood influences his or her willingness to report the unethical actions of a colleague. Participants’ experienced an affectively charged, unrelated event and were then asked to make a decision regarding whistle-blowing intentions in a public accounting context. As expected, negative mood was associated with lower intentions to report the unethical actions of others to a superior within the organization. The Graham model, which proposes that reporting intentions are impacted by the three determinants of seriousness, personal responsibility and cost, was employed to more clearly understand the nature of the affect–reporting intention relationship. The role of affect was explained by demonstrating that two determinants mediate the relationship between mood and whistle-blowing intentions. Specifically, as seriousness and responsibility have a positive impact on reporting intentions, the reduction of these perceptions by negative mood reduces the intent to report. The negative impact of personal cost on reporting intentions was significant, although not as a mediator of mood.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The relationship between clinical audit and ethics.S. Kinn - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):250-253.
The role of audit in making do not resuscitate decisions.Suzanne Hayes & Kevin Stewart - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (3):305-312.
The ethical judgment of animal research.Shelley L. Gavin & Harold A. Herzog - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):263 – 286.
Clinical audit and reform of the UK research ethics review system.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
Independence in corporate governance: The audit committee role.Laura Spira - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (4):262–273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#301,544)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations.Alice Gaudine & Linda Thorne - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):175 - 187.
Code of Professional Conduct.Construction Surveyors Institute - 1996 - Architects & Surveyors Institute.

Add more references