Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):191-209 (2006)
AbstractThis study explores the impact of mood on individuals’ ethical decision-making processes through the Graham [Graham, J. W.: 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 1–52] model of Principled Organizational Dissent. In particular, the research addresses how an individual’s mood influences his or her willingness to report the unethical actions of a colleague. Participants’ experienced an affectively charged, unrelated event and were then asked to make a decision regarding whistle-blowing intentions in a public accounting context. As expected, negative mood was associated with lower intentions to report the unethical actions of others to a superior within the organization. The Graham model, which proposes that reporting intentions are impacted by the three determinants of seriousness, personal responsibility and cost, was employed to more clearly understand the nature of the affect–reporting intention relationship. The role of affect was explained by demonstrating that two determinants mediate the relationship between mood and whistle-blowing intentions. Specifically, as seriousness and responsibility have a positive impact on reporting intentions, the reduction of these perceptions by negative mood reduces the intent to report. The negative impact of personal cost on reporting intentions was significant, although not as a mediator of mood.
Similar books and articles
Ethical issues related to the provision of audit and non-audit services: Evidence from academic research. [REVIEW]Hollis Ashbaugh - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):143-148.
Egoistic and ethical orientations of university students toward work-related decisions.Jon M. Shepard & Linda S. Hartenian - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (4):303 - 310.
An Experimental Investigation of How Ethical Orientations, Tax Rates, Penalty Rates, and Audit Rates Affect Tax Compliance Decisions.Carl Edward Keller - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Ethical consistency in managerial decisions.Willie E. Hopkins, Shirley A. Hopkins & Bryant C. Mitchell - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (1):26 – 43.
The relationship between clinical audit and ethics.S. Kinn - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):250-253.
To Sue or Not to Sue: An Experimental Study of Factors Affecting Hong Kong Liquidators Audit Litigation Decisions. [REVIEW]Michael J. Ferguson & Abdul Majid - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):363 - 374.
The role of audit in making do not resuscitate decisions.Suzanne Hayes & Kevin Stewart - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (3):305-312.
The ethical judgment of animal research.Shelley L. Gavin & Harold A. Herzog - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):263 – 286.
Mood-dependent retrieval and mood awareness.John H. Mueller, Tim R. Grove & W. Burt Thompson - 1991 - Cognition and Emotion 5 (4):331-349.
Predictors of ethical decisions regarding insider trading.David E. Terpstra, Mario G. C. Reyes & Donald W. Bokor - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):699 - 710.
An audit of clinical outcomes and client and referrer satisfaction with a Mood and Anxiety Disorders Unit.Raylene Lewis, Emma Musella, Michael Berk, Seetal Dodd, Helen McKenzie & Mary Hyland - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (4):549-552.
Clinical audit and reform of the UK research ethics review system.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
Nurses' Ethical Perceptions of Health Care and of Medical Clinical Research: an Audit in a French University Teaching Hospital.Ghislaine Benhamou-Jantelet - 2001 - Nursing Ethics 8 (2):114-122.
The Impact of Ethical Leadership, the Internal Audit Function, and Moral Intensity on a Financial Reporting Decision.Barbara Arel, Cathy A. Beaudoin & Anna M. Cianci - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):351-366.
Independence in corporate governance: The audit committee role.Laura Spira - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (4):262–273.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. [REVIEW]Jana L. Craft - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2):221-259.
Research Note and Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: Boundary Conditions and Extensions.Nitish Singh, Yung-Hwal Park & Kevin Lehnert - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 129 (1):195-219.
The Effect of Leadership Style, Framing, and Promotion Regulatory Focus on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior.Katrina A. Graham, Jonathan C. Ziegert & Johnna Capitano - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 126 (3):423-436.
An Examination of the Layers of Workplace Influences in Ethical Judgments: Whistleblowing Likelihood and Perseverance in Public Accounting.Eileen Z. Taylor & Mary B. Curtis - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 93 (1):21-37.
Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.Hengky Latan, Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 155 (1):289-304.
References found in this work
Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations.Alice Gaudine & Linda Thorne - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):175 - 187.
Affective causes and consequences of social information processing.Gerald L. Clore, Norbert Schwarz & Michael Conway - 1994 - In R. Wyer & T. Srull (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 1--323.
Code of Professional Conduct.Construction Surveyors Institute - 1996 - Architects & Surveyors Institute.