Suggestions On How To Combine The Platonic Forms To Overcome The Interpretative Difficulties Of The Parmenides Dialogue

Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 60 (156):157-171 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides an original approach to research on the logical processes that determine how certain forms participate in others. By introducing the concept of relational participation, the problems of self-referentiality of the Platonic forms can be dealt with more effectively. Applying this to the forms of likeness and unlikeness in Parmenides 132d-133a reveals a possible way to resolve different versions of the Third Man Argument. The method of generating numbers from oddness and evenness may also be of interest; relational participation in these forms clarifies the interpretation of Parmenides 143e-144a.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-29

Downloads
442 (#46,697)

6 months
159 (#25,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Plato: Meno and Phaedo.David Sedley & Alex Long (eds.) - 1980 - Cambridge University Press.
Plato and Parmenides.Francis MacDonald Cornford - 1939 - Mind 48 (192):536-543.
Plato's Lysis.Terry Penner & Christopher Rowe - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by C. J. Rowe.

View all 17 references / Add more references