Synthese (Suppl 16):1-26 (2019)

Authors
Karen Crowther
University of Oslo
Niels Linnemann
University of Geneva
Christian Wüthrich
University of Geneva
Abstract
Analogue experiments have attracted interest for their potential to shed light on inaccessible domains. For instance, ‘dumb holes’ in fluids and Bose–Einstein condensates, as analogues of black holes, have been promoted as means of confirming the existence of Hawking radiation in real black holes. We compare analogue experiments with other cases of experiment and simulation in physics. We argue—contra recent claims in the philosophical literature—that analogue experiments are not capable of confirming the existence of particular phenomena in inaccessible target systems. As they must assume the physical adequacy of the modelling framework used to describe the inaccessible target system, arguments to the conclusion that analogue experiments can yield confirmation for phenomena in those target systems, such as Hawking radiation in black holes, beg the question.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02190-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Tale of Two Methods.Eric Winsberg - 2009 - Synthese 169 (3):575 - 592.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Limits of Experimental Knowledge.Peter Evans & Karim P. Y. Thebault - 2020 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 378 (2177).
Lost horizon? – modeling black holes in string theory.Nick Huggett & Keizo Matsubara - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-19.
How to Think About Analogical Inferences: A Reply to Norton.Benjamin S. Genta - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82:17-24.
Why Not a Sound Postulate?Bryan Cheng & James Read - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (3):1-20.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hawking Radiation and Analogue Experiments: A Bayesian Analysis.Radin Dardashti, Stephan Hartmann, Karim Thébault & Eric Winsberg - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67:1-11.
Analogue Magnitude Representations: A Philosophical Introduction.Jacob Beck - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):829-855.
The Case for Black Hole Thermodynamics Part I: Phenomenological Thermodynamics.David Wallace - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64:52-67.
Are Computer Simulations Experiments? And If Not, How Are They Related to Each Other?Claus Beisbart - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):171-204.
Thought Experiments in Philosophy.Soren Haggqvist - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (3):480.
Analogien in Physik und Technik im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert†.Walter Kaiser - 1989 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 12 (1):19-34.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-11-09

Total views
57 ( #191,444 of 2,462,324 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,952 of 2,462,324 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes