By parallel reasoning: the construction and evaluation of analogical arguments

New York: Oxford University Press (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this work, Paul Bartha proposes a normative theory of analogical arguments and raises questions and proposes answers regarding the criteria for evaluating analogical arguments, the philosophical justification for analogical reasoning, and the place of scientific analogies in the context of theoretical confirmation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-14

Downloads
180 (#102,717)

6 months
12 (#137,533)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Bartha
University of British Columbia

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references