Research Ethics 8 (4):200-211 (2012)
AbstractThere are different groups in society who may be considered vulnerable, for example those experiencing mental or physical health issues, learning disabilities, prisoners or children. There are, however, other groups in society who may also be regarded as vulnerable, such as those who are bereaved. Vulnerability in relation to the bereaved occurs as a result of experiencing a normal life event, death or a loss. In this situation vulnerability may be transient and, depending upon the management of the bereavement, generally temporary. Unlike the aforementioned groups, participants required for this type of research (bereavement, death and dying) are able to consent themselves into projects, and the capacity to do so is not an issue. Undertaking research with those who may be considered vulnerable into sensitive, emotive topics such as death and dying can create difficulties for the National Research Ethics Service (NRES), making it difficult to get approval for such studies. It appears that the ethical issues are concerned with not wishing to cause distress to participants when asked for research purposes to recollect what for some may have been emotionally challenging and traumatic events. The article offers a narrative, reflective account of the above from several perspectives: being employed as a contract researcher in a university; having experience of being an active member of a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee; and later assuming the role of full-time postgraduate (PhD) student requiring ethical approval to undertake research with what may be considered a vulnerable group involving a sensitive and emotive topic. Valuable insights from participants – their views on participation in an emotive research project and good practice in research having been explored via questionnaire – are highlighted and discussed
Similar books and articles
Joining the conspiracy? Negotiating ethics and emotions in researching (around) AIDS in southern Africa.Nicola Ansell & Lorraine Van Blerk - 2005 - Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (1):61 – 82.
Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays.Yoel Inbar, David A. Pizarro, Joshua Knobe & Paul Bloom - 2009 - Emotion 9 (3): 435– 43.
Toward a Theory of Emotive Performance: With Lessons from How Politicians Do Anger.Kwai Hang Ng & Jeffrey L. Kidder - 2010 - Sociological Theory 28 (2):193 - 214.
Going Boldly Where No One Has Gone Before? How Confidentiality Risk Aversion is Killing Research on Sensitive Topics.Ted Palys & John Lowman - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):265-284.
Identifying Optimum Performance Trade-Offs Using a Cognitively Bounded Rational Analysis Model of Discretionary Task Interleaving.Christian P. Janssen, Duncan P. Brumby, John Dowell, Nick Chater & Andrew Howes - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (1):123-139.
A phenomenological survey of auditory verbal hallucinations in the hypnagogic and hypnopompic states.Simon R. Jones, Charles Fernyhough & Frank Larøi - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (2):213-224.
The Humanities and Telecommunication Technology.George Teschner - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:247-257.
Autonomy and credibility: Voice as method.Ira J. Cohen & Mary F. Rogers - 1994 - Sociological Theory 12 (3):304-318.
Reflections on the researcher-participant relationship and the ethics of dialogue.Dalit Yassour-Borochowitz - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (2):175 – 186.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The intervening effect of the What Being the Parent of a New Baby is Like-Revised questionnaire on maternal affect.A. H. Elise van Beeck, Karen F. Pridham & Yvonne Kuipers - 2022 - Research Ethics 18 (3):250-262.
We are people and so are they: Shared intimacies and the ethics of digital ethnography in autism communities.Débora Antunes & Alexander Dhoest - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (2):1-17.
Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying.James A. Roffee & Andrea Waling - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (1):4-22.
References found in this work
Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees.T. I. Juritzen, H. Grimen & K. Heggen - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (5):640-650.