PROs in the Balance: Ethical Implications of Collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures in the Electronic Health Record

, , , , , &
American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):67-68 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2016.1146543

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Impact of patient‐reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.Susan Marshall, Kirstie Haywood & Ray Fitzpatrick - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (5):559-568.
Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure.Leah M. McClimans & John Browne - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (1):47-60.
Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.Merle Spriggs, Michael V. Arnold, Christopher M. Pearce & Craig Fry - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (9):535-539.
A theoretical framework for patient-reported outcome measures.Leah McClimans - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (3):225-240.
A software platform to analyse the ethical issues of electronic patient privacy policy: the S3P example.M. A. Mizani & N. Baykal - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):695-698.
Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.F. E. M. Murtagh - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):311-315.
Quality of life is a process not an outcome.Leah McClimans & John P. Browne - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):279-292.
Assessing quality of care: what are the implications of the potential lack of sensitivity of outcome measures to differences in quality?Jonathan Mant & Nicholas R. Hicks - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (4):243-248.
Ethical and legal issues in the use of health information technology to improve patient safety.Eta S. Berner - 2008 - HEC Forum 20 (3):243-258.
The Hippocratic Bargain and Health Information Technology.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):7-13.
Why the NHS should abandon the search for the universal outcome measure.Reva Berman Brown, Sean McCartney & Louise Bell - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (3):191-195.
Electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among hospitals in New York State.Erika L. Abramson, Sandra McGinnis, Alison Edwards, Dayna M. Maniccia, Jean Moore & Rainu Kaushal - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1156-1162.
Debate Over Patient Privacy Control in Electronic Health Record.Mark Rothstein - forthcoming - Bioethics Forum.
Electronic health record identification of prediabetes and an assessment of unmet counselling needs.Laura J. Zimmermann, Jason A. Thompson & Stephen D. Persell - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):861-865.
Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference.Leah McClimans - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (6):389-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
44 (#359,296)

6 months
12 (#208,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Crites
Oregon Health Sciences University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references