Revolutionary China and Its Late-Capitalist Fate

Historical Materialism 23 (2):257-286 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines several works that contribute to an understanding of the nature of contemporary Chinese capitalism and its historical development. Core issues include the character of the bureaucracy, which has had a distinctive relationship to capital formation, and the character of the working class. The periodisation of Chinese capitalism and the relation between the pre- and post-reform periods are pressing political and analytical concerns. This essay suggests the advantages of a clearer focus on the dynamics of depoliticisation in understanding the transition. The contemporary left-intelligentsia in China has in large part pinned its hopes on achieving some form of ideological hegemony within theccp, maintaining that it still operates within its revolutionary tradition. This represents a questionable strategic gamble. Acknowledging the important contributions made by Au’s book and other recent characterisations of China’s political economy from the left, this essay suggests that there remains much to be done.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
28 (#553,444)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Brief History of Neoliberalism.David Harvey - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
.Morris Silver - 2016 - 98 (1):184-202.
.Pierre Conway (ed.) - 1962 - College of St. Mary of the Springs.

View all 6 references / Add more references