Is There Something Wrong With the Task of Thinking?

Environmental Philosophy 17 (1):39-58 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One way to approach the widely acknowledged failure to act on climate change would be to turn to the philosophical tradition, going back to Kant at least, that diagnoses all the internal impediments to thinking. It is with Heidegger, however, that thinking is curiously divided between a disclosure of the world, and the world’s occlusion. Rather than pursue Heidegger’s project of destroying throught’s accretions and returning to the world I will argue that it is the very concept of ‘thinking’ in the grand sense that needs to be destroyed if we are to be open to the future.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Happens to Us When We Think. [REVIEW]Matthew Rellihan - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 58 (3):659-660.
Transformations: Thinking After Heidegger.Gail Stenstad - 2006 - University of Wisconsin Press.
Nietzsche’s Environmental Ethics.Max O. Hallman - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (2):99-125.
Nietzsche’s Environmental Ethics.Max O. Hallman - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (2):99-125.
Risk writ large.Johanna Thoma & Jonathan Weisberg - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2369-2384.
A Heideggerian Perspective on Thinking about Water.Kalpita Bhar Paul - 2019 - Environmental Philosophy 16 (2):339-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-08

Downloads
11 (#351,772)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claire Colebrook
Pennsylvania State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references