Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2369-2384 (2017)

Johanna Thoma
London School of Economics
Risk-weighted expected utility theory is motivated by small-world problems like the Allais paradox, but it is a grand-world theory by nature. And, at the grand-world level, its ability to handle the Allais paradox is dubious. The REU model described in Risk and Rationality turns out to be risk-seeking rather than risk-averse on one natural way of formulating the Allais gambles in the grand-world context. This result illustrates a general problem with the case for REU theory, we argue. There is a tension between the small-world thinking marshaled against standard expected utility theory, and the grand-world thinking inherent to the risk-weighted alternative.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0916-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
Risk and Rationality.Lara Buchak - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1956 - Philosophy of Science 23 (2):166-166.
Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations.Edward Francis McClennen - 1990 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Accurate Updating for the Risk Sensitive.Catrin Campbell-Moore & Bernhard Salow - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axaa006.
Normative Decision Theory.Edward Elliott - 2019 - Analysis 79 (4):755-772.
No Escape From Allais: Reply to Buchak.Johanna Thoma & Jonathan Weisberg - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2493-2500.
Replies to Commentators.Lara Buchak - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2397-2414.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Risk and Tradeoffs.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S6):1091-1117.
Revisiting Risk and Rationality: A Reply to Pettigrew and Briggs.Lara Buchak - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5):841-862.
Replies to Commentators.Lara Buchak - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2397-2414.
Risk and Rationality.Lara Buchak - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Towards a Positive Theory of Preferences Under Risk.Ole Hagen - 1979 - In Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen (eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel. pp. 271--302.
Precis of Risk and Rationality.Lara Buchak - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2363-2368.
On Risk and Rationality.Brad Armendt - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S6):1-9.


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #182,290 of 2,498,501 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,198 of 2,498,501 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes