E-mail, terrorism, and the right to privacy

Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):17-27 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses privacy and the monitoring of e-mail in the context of the international nature of the modern world. Its three main aims are: (1) to highlight the problems involved in discussing an essentially philosophical question within a legal framework, and thus to show that providing purely legal answers to an ethical question is an inadequate approach to the problem of privacy on the Internet; (2) to discuss and define what privacy in the medium of the Internet actually is; and (3) to apply a globally acceptable ethical approach of international human rights to the problem of privacy on the Internet, and thus to answer the question of what is and is not morally permissible in this area, especially in light of recent heightened concerns about terrorist activities. It concludes that the monitoring of e-mail is, at least in the vast majority of cases, an unjustified infringement of the right to privacy, even if this monitoring is only aimed at preventing the commission of acts of terrorism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
184 (#107,214)

6 months
10 (#269,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Privacy, the workplace and the internet.Seumas Miller & John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet.John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255-265.
Privacy and the Right to Privacy.H. J. McCloskey - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (211):17 - 38.
Reasonable expectations of privacy.Robert L. McArthur - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):123-128.
Privacy and the question of technology.Lisa Austin - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (2):119-166.

View all 6 references / Add more references