When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities

Phronesis 61 (3):337-372 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I offer a new interpretation of the passages where Aristotle maintains that intellectual activity employs φαντάσµατα (images). In theoretical understanding of mathematical and natural beings, we usually need to consciously employ appropriate φαντάσµατα in order to grasp explanatory connections. Aristotle does not, however, commit himself to thinking that images are required for exercising all theoretical understanding: understanding immaterial things, in particular, may not involve φαντάσµατα. Thus the connection that Aristotle makes between images and understanding does not rule out the possibility that human intellectual activity could occur apart from the body.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Caleb Cohoe
Metropolitan State University of Denver

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Good and Evil.Peter Geach - 1956 - Analysis 17 (2):33 - 42.
Aristotle on Ontological Dependence.Phil Corkum - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (1):65 - 92.
Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
Aristotle and the problem of intentionality.Victor Caston - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):249-298.

View all 16 references / Add more references