Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4

Phronesis 58 (4):347-377 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I reconstruct Aristotle’s reasons for thinking that the intellect cannot have a bodily organ. I present Aristotle’s account of the aboutness or intentionality of cognitive states, both perceptual and intellectual. On my interpretation, Aristotle’s account is based around the notion of cognitive powers taking on forms in a special preservative way. Based on this account, Aristotle argues that no physical structure could enable a bodily part or combination of bodily parts to produce or determine the full range of forms that the human intellect can understand. For Aristotle, cognitive powers with bodily organs are always spatiotemporally limited, but the understanding is not. Aristotle claims that our understanding applies to all instances of the thing understood wherever and whenever they exist. On Aristotle’s own account the intellect in its nature is only “potential,” it does not actually possess any form. Thus nothing prevents it from possessing all forms.

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s Immortal Intellect.Mark Amorose - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:97-106.
The Place of Intellect in Aristotle.Kurt Pritzl - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:57-75.
Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect.Lorelle Lamascus - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.
Más allá de Aristóteles: un análisis metafísico del entendimiento.David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2009 - In Alfonso Pérez de Laborda (ed.), El Dios de Aristóteles. Νόησις Νόησεως. Ediciones de la Facultad de Teología San Dámaso. pp. 345-366.
On Aristotle on the intellect (De anima 3.4-8).John Philoponus - 1991 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Edited by William Charlton, Fernand Bossier & William.
Abstraction in al-Fârâbî.Richard C. Taylor - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:151-168.
Themistius on concept acquisition and knowledge of essences.Myrna Gabbe - 2010 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):215-235.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-22

Downloads
1,566 (#6,360)

6 months
259 (#8,451)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Caleb Cohoe
Metropolitan State University of Denver

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.

View all 57 references / Add more references