Philosophical Review 80 (4):448-475 (1971)

S. Marc Cohen
University of Washington
The main lines of interpretation offered to date of the Third Man Argument in Plato's Parmenides (132a1-b2) are considered and rejected. A new, set-theoretic, reconstruction of the argument is offered. It is concluded that the philosophical point of the argument is different from what it has been generally supposed to be: Plato is pointing out the logical shortcomings in his earlier formulated principle of One-Over-Many.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2183753
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abstract Objects.Gideon Rosen - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle on Ontological Dependence.Phil Corkum - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (1):65 - 92.
Aristotle on Mathematical Truth.Phil Corkum - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (6):1057-1076.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
150 ( #73,565 of 2,462,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,108 of 2,462,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes