- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can the logic of indirect discourse be formalised?
Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):225-232 (1957)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can the Logic of Indirect Discourse be Formalised?L. Jonathan Cohen, A. N. Prior & R. L. Goodstein - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):549-550.
L. Jonathan Cohen. Can the logic of indirect discourse be formalised?The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 22 , pp. 225–232. - A. N. Prior. Epimenides the Cretan. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 3 , pp. 261–266. - R. L. Goodstein. On the formalisation of indirect discourse. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 4 , pp. 417–419. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Professor Goodstein's formalisation of the policeman. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 4 , p. 420. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):549-550.
L. Jonathan Cohen. Why do Cretans have to say so much?Philosophical studies , vol. 12 , pp. 72–78. - A. N. Prior. Indirect speech again. Philosophical studies , vol. 14 , pp. 12–15. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Indirect speech: A rejoinder to Prof. A. N. Prior. Philosophical studies , vol. 14 , pp. 15–18. - A. N. Prior. Indirect speech and extensionality. Philosophical studies , vol. 15 , pp. 35–38. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Indirect speech: A further rejoinder to Professor Prior. Philosophical studies , vol. 15 , pp. 38–40. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):550-550.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, The Diversity of Meaning. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bennett - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (2):316-318.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, Postscript (1954). [REVIEW]Alice Ambrose - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):301-301.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, Tense Usage and Propositions. [REVIEW]Alice Ambrose - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):297-298.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, A Formalisation of Referentially Opaque Contexts. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):550-550.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, Are Philosophical Theses Relative to Language? [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):63-63.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, Why do Cretans have to Say so Much? [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):550-550.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#104,651)
6 months
14 (#987,135)
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#104,651)
6 months
14 (#987,135)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Unity, truth and the liar: the modern relevance of medieval solutions to the liar paradox.Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo & Emmanuel Genot (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Springer.
Uma solução aristotélica para o paradoxo do mentiroso em Metafísica IV, 8.Nazareno Eduardo de Almeida - 2013 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 58 (3):429-466.
Gaps, Gluts, and Paradox.A. D. Irvine - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 18 (sup1):273-299.
References found in this work
The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays.Frank Plumpton Ramsey - 1925 - London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Edited by R. B. Braithwaite.
On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief.A. Church - 1949 - Analysis 10 (5):97-99.
Intensional isomorphism and identity of belief.Alonzo Church - 1954 - Philosophical Studies 5 (5):65 - 73.
The inconsistency or redundancy of principia mathematica.Irving M. Copi - 1950 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (2):190-199.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo