The relation between extent and contrast in the liminal stimulus for vision

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 10 (4):350 (1927)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0073986

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Visual perceptual latency as a function of stimulus brightness and contour shape.Paul G. Cheatham - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (5):369.
Fluctuation of sensation of liminal visual stimuli.A. Sweetland - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (6):459.
Stimulus exposure time, brightness, and spatial factors as determinants of visual perception.Jacques Kaswan & Stephen Young - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2):113.
Is no-stimulus a stimulus?Robert Fried, Livingston Welch & Miriam Friedman - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):145.
Differential relation of latency and response vigor to stimulus similarity in brightness discrimination.Alfred Castaneda & Leonard Worell - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):309.
Low-level phenomenal vision despite unilateral destruction of primary visual cortex.Petra Stoerig & Erhardt Barth - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):574-587.
Stimulus itensity and the asymmetrical matching principle.Sandra Harris & E. Neil Murray - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):257.
The role of contrast in stimulus intensity dynamism (V).Keith W. Johnsgard - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):173.
The concept of the threshold and Heymans' law of inhibition. II. Correlation of the visual threshold and Heymans' coefficient of inhibition in a single individual with uniocular vision. [REVIEW]L. T. Spencer & L. H. Cohen - 1928 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 (3):194.
Some effects of contour on simultaneous brightness contrast.Phyllis W. Berman & H. W. Leibowitz - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):251.
Changes in GSR to a single stimulus as a result of training on a compound stimulus.William W. Grings & Vsevolod N. Shmelev - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):129.
Stimulus meaning in stimulus predifferentiation.Sheila M. Pfafflin - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):269.
The Relation between Field Brightness and the Speed of Retinal Impression.P. W. Cobb - 1923 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 6 (2):138.
Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus.John C. Hay & Herbert L. Pick Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
8 (#1,296,210)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references