Introduction: Conspiracy Theories

Episteme 4 (2):131-134 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been a lively philosophical debate about the nature of conspiracy theories and their epistemic status going on for some years now. This debate has shed light, not only on conspiracy theories themselves, but also, in the process, on a variety of issues in social epistemology, political philosophy, and the philosophy of religion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing.Steve Clarke - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
Conspiracy theories of quantum mechanics.Peter J. Lewis - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):359-381.
Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational?David Coady - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):193-204.
Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories?Charles Pigden - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.
Shit Happens.Pete Mandik - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):205-218.
Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.David Coady - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-11

Downloads
191 (#103,356)

6 months
16 (#154,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Coady
University of Tasmania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Of conspiracy theories.Brian Keeley - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):109-126.
Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.David Coady - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.
Malevolent global conspiracy.Lee Basham - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):91–103.

Add more references