- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Systematicity, structured representations and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn
In Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 198--218 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The constituent structure of connectionist mental states: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (S1):137-161.
Connectionist Networks and Systematicity: Exploring an alternative architecture of the mind to that proposed by Fodor and Pylyshyn.Liam Wilkinson - unknown
Tensor products and split-level architecture: Foundational issues in the classicism-connectionism debate.Marcello Guarini - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):S239-S247.
Autonomy, implementation and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 1990 - Cognition 34 (1):93-107.
Connectionism and the language of thought.Mark Rowlands - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):485-503.
Three-concept Monte: Explanation, implementation, and systematicity.Robert J. Matthews - 1994 - Synthese 101 (3):347-63.
Connectionism and cognition: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn are wrong.James H. Fetzer - 1992 - In A. Clark & Ronald Lutz (eds.), Connectionism in Context. Springer Verlag. pp. 305-319.
Connectionism, constituency and the language of thought.Paul Smolensky - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)
6 months
36 (#102,577)
2014-01-26
Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)
6 months
36 (#102,577)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The connectionism/classicism battle to win souls.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 71 (2):163-190.
Do connectionist representations earn their explanatory keep?William Ramsey - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (1):34-66.
Do Connectionist Representations Earn Their Explanatory Keep?William Ramsey - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (1):34-66.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo