Connectionism, constituency and the language of thought

In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Connectionism and cognition: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn are wrong.James H. Fetzer - 1992 - In A. Clark & Ronald Lutz (eds.), Connectionism in Context. Springer Verlag. pp. 305-319.
Connectionism and the language of thought.Mark Rowlands - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):485-503.
The constituent structure of connectionist mental states.Paul Smolensky - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 26:137-60.
Fodor and Pylyshyn on connectionism.Michael V. Antony - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (3):321-41.
Concepts, connectionism, and the language of thought.Martin Davies - 1991 - In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. M. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 485-503.
Systematicity, structured representations and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Andy Clark - 1991 - In Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 198--218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references