Diachronic coherence versus epistemic impartiality

Philosophical Review 109 (3):349-371 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is obvious that we would not want to demand that an agent' s beliefs at different times exhibit the same sort of consistency that we demand from an agent' s simultaneous beliefs; there' s nothing irrational about believing P at one time and not-P at another. Nevertheless, many have thought that some sort of coherence or stability of beliefs over time is an important component of epistemic rationality.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#137,458)

6 months
922 (#1,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Christensen
Brown University

Citations of this work

Epistemology of disagreement: The good news.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Uniqueness and Metaepistemology.Daniel Greco & Brian Hedden - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (8):365-395.
Time-Slice Rationality.Brian Hedden - 2015 - Mind 124 (494):449-491.
Epistemic Expansions.Jennifer Carr - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (2):217-236.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Clever bookies and coherent beliefs.David Christensen - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):229-247.
How should future opinion affect current opinion?Richard Foley - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):747-766.

Add more references