Still far too sexy a topic

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):248-249 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Geary is highly selective in his use of the literature on gender differences. His assumption of consistent female inferiority in mathematics is not necessarily supported by the facts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex differences and evolutionary by-products.Thomas Wynn, Forrest Tierson & Craig Palmer - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):265-266.
The logic of the sociobiological model Geary-style.Diane Proudfoot - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):261-261.
How important is spatial ability to mathematics?Ann Dowker - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):251-251.
A step too far?Dianne C. Berry - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):397-398.
Arithmetic and old lace.Jeffrey Foss - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):252-253.
Sex differences in mathematics: Why the fuss?Lionel Tiger - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (2):212-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
14 (#994,650)

6 months
6 (#700,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?