- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the revision of probabilistic beliefs using uncertain evidence
Artificial Intelligence 163 (1):67-90 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
An AGM-style belief revision mechanism for probabilistic spatio-temporal logics.John Grant, Francesco Parisi, Austin Parker & V. S. Subrahmanian - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence 174 (1):72-104.
Distributed revision of composite beliefs.Judea Pearl - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 33 (2):173-215.
Algorithms and mechanisms for procuring services with uncertain durations using redundancy.S. Stein, E. H. Gerding, A. C. Rogers, K. Larson & N. R. Jennings - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (14-15):2021-2060.
The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using bayesian belief networks.Gregory F. Cooper - 1990 - Artificial Intelligence 42 (2-3):393-405.
Reachability analysis of uncertain systems using bounded-parameter Markov decision processes.Xenofon di WuKoutsoukos - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence 172 (8-9):945-954.
Revision of Spatial Information by Containment.Omar Doukari, Robert Jeansoulin & Eric Würbel - 2008 - In Tu-Bao Ho & Zhi-Hua Zhou (eds.), Pricai 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 939--944.
A Qualitative Linear Utility Theory for Spohn's Theory of Epistemic Beliefs.Phan H. Giang & Prakash P. Shenoy - 2000 - In C. Boutilier & M. Goldszmidt (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 16. Morgan Kaufmann.
On Transformations between Probability and Spohnian Disbelief Functions.Phan H. Giang & Prakash P. Shenoy - 1999 - In K. B. Laskey & H. Prade (eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 15. Morgan Kaufmann.
Probabilistic analysis of the complexity of A∗.Nam Huyn, Rina Dechter & Judea Pearl - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 15 (3):241-254.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
4 (#1,642,915)
6 months
3 (#1,046,495)
2020-12-22
Downloads
4 (#1,642,915)
6 months
3 (#1,046,495)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reflection and conditionalization: Comments on Michael Rescorla.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2023 - Noûs 57 (3):539-552.
From Knowledge-based Programs to Graded Belief-based Programs, Part I: On-line Reasoning.Noël Laverny & Jérôme Lang - 2005 - Synthese 147 (2):277-321.
The value of cost-free uncertain evidence.Patryk Dziurosz-Serafinowicz & Dominika Dziurosz-Serafinowicz - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):13313-13343.
Probabilistic Belief Contraction.Raghav Ramachandran, Arthur Ramer & Abhaya C. Nayak - 2012 - Minds and Machines 22 (4):325-351.
Interventions and belief change in possibilistic graphical models.Salem Benferhat - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence 174 (2):177-189.
References found in this work
On the logic of iterated belief revision.Adnan Darwiche & Judea Pearl - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence 89 (1-2):1-29.
Probability kinematics and commutativity.Carl G. Wagner - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):266-278.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo