On Quine's 'so-called paradox'

&
Mind 74 (295):424-425 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lxxiv.295.424

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Chapman and Butler on Quine's 'so-called paradox'.S. Venketsamy - 1974 - Philosophical Papers 3 (1):51-53.
"Cartesian Studies". Edited by R. J. Butler. [REVIEW]A. O'hear - 1974 - Mind 83:454.
On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):147-149.
WYBURN, G. M., PICKFORD, R. W. and HIRST, R. J. - "Human Senses and Perception". [REVIEW]G. J. Warnock - 1967 - Mind 76:145.
Art and the Mind. Various - unknown
BUTLER, R. J. : "Cartesian Studies". [REVIEW]Hiram Caton - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51:173.
Ehrenfest’s Paradox and Radial Electric Field in Quasi-Neutral Tokamak Plasma.A. Romannikov - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (8):1331-1337.
Essays in Thomism.Robert Edward Brennan (ed.) - 1942 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Review: R. J. Butler, Analytical Philosophy. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (3):139-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
59 (#85,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Expecting the unexpected.Avishai Margalit & Maya Bar-Hillel - 1983 - Philosophia 13 (3-4):263-288.
The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
On paradoxes and a surprise exam.Richard L. Kirkham - 1991 - Philosophia 21 (1-2):31-51.
The surprise exam paradox: a note on formulating it and a solution to it.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2019 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 12 (2):181-186.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references