Making comparisons count

New York: Routledge (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central aim of this book is to answer two questions: Are alternatives for choice ever incomparable? and, In what ways can items be compared? The arguments offered suggest that alternatives for choice no matter how different are never incomparable, and that the ways in which items can be compared are richer and more varied than commonly supposed. This work is the first book length treatment of the topics of incomparability, value, and practical reason.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
162 (#118,258)

6 months
12 (#213,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Chang
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Hard Choices.Ruth Chang - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (1):1-21.
Value relations.Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2008 - Theoria 74 (1):18-49.
Value Incomparability and Incommensurability.Ruth Chang - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford University Press.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references