Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):206-243 (2009)

Authors
Sophie Grace Chappell
Open University (UK)
Abstract
I develop an anti-theory view of ethics. Moral theory (Kantian, utilitarian, virtue ethical, etc.) is the dominant approach to ethics among academic philosophers. But moral theory's hunt for a single Master Factor (utility, universalisability, virtue . . .) is implausibly systematising and reductionist. Perhaps scientism drives the approach? But good science always insists on respect for the data, even messy data: I criticise Singer's remarks on infanticide as a clear instance of moral theory failing to respect the data of moral perceptions and moral intuitions. Moral theory also fails to provide a coherent basis for real-world motivation, justification, explanation, and prediction of good and bad, right and wrong. Consider for instance the marginal place of love in moral theory, compared with its central place in people's actual ethical outlooks and decision making. Hence, moral theory typically fails to ground any adequate ethical outlook. I propose that it is the notion of an ethical outlook that philosophical ethicists should pursue, not the unfruitful and distorting notion of a moral theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01374.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Harvard University Press.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Whence the Demand for Ethical Theory?Damian Cueni & Matthieu Queloz - 2021 - American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (2):135–46.
How We Decide in Moral Situations.David Kaspar - 2015 - Philosophy 90 (1):59-81.
What Have I Done?Timothy Chappell - 2013 - Diametros 38:86-111.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Michalos and the Theory of Ethical Theory.Bernard J. Hodgson - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):19 - 23.
Virtue Ethics, Theory, and Warrant.Garrett Cullity - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):277-294.
Beyond the Bottom Line: The Theoretical Goals of Moral Theorizing.Jason Brennan - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (2):277-296.
The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics.Raymond De Vries - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):419-430.
Moral Motivation.R. Jay Wallace - 1998 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
335 ( #28,391 of 2,462,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #53,354 of 2,462,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes