Bolzano und Leibniz über Klarheit und Deutlichkeit

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):256-289 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At a time when they had largely fallen into disrepute Bolzano reactivated the distinctions between ‚clear‘ and ‚obscure‘, ‚distinct‘ and ‚confused‘ ideas. In the central sections of this paper I offer a critical reconstruction of the explanations of these pairs of opposita which are to be found in vol. III of Bolzano's monumental Wissenschaftslehre . I then provide a detailed account of its Leibnizian counterparts that were well-known to the ‚Bohemian Leibniz‘, and finally I evaluate Bolzano's criticism thereof

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remarks on Bolzano's Conception of Necessary Truth.Paul Rusnock - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):1-21.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-21

Downloads
30 (#530,318)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stefania Centrone
Technische Universität Berlin

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references