- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to Longuenesse [Book Review]
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):525-531 (2008)
Abstract
No AbstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to the comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg.Henry Allison - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194.
Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's transcendental deduction.Henry E. Allison - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):67 – 80.
Cassam and Kant on "how possible" questions and categorial thinking.Beatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):510-517.
Longuenesse on Kant and the Priority of the Capacity to Judge.Sally Sedgwick - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):81 – 90.
The unity of time's measure: Kant's reply to Locke.Katherine Dunlop - 2009 - Philosophers' Imprint 9:1-31.
Reply to Stroud. [REVIEW]Quassim Cassam - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):532-538.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
56 (#283,771)
6 months
2 (#1,192,610)
2009-01-28
Downloads
56 (#283,771)
6 months
2 (#1,192,610)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Problems of Kantian Nonconceptualism and the Transcendental Deduction.Dennis Schulting - 2017 - In Kant's Radical Subjectivism. Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction. London, UK: Palgrave. pp. 195-255.
Why Kantian Nonconceptualists Can't Have Their Cake and Eat It—Reply To Sacha Golob.Dennis Schulting - 2018 - Critique:00-00.
References found in this work
Representations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science.Jerry A. Fodor - 1981 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason.Béatrice Longuenesse - 1998 - Princeton University Press.
Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science.Jerry A. Fodor - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (2):175-182.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-bl6rh uwo