Qualitative research on anomalous experience: Between Borges and a hard place…

Abstract

With the help of the Argentine writer Borges, I will illustrate the absurdity of assuming that science may either grasp reality fully or convey it through abstractions. My departing point is that every methodological perspective has something to contribute to our attempts to elucidate anomalous experiences, and that the extremes of “realness” or abstraction lead to fallacies. The articles in this issue exhibit a different array of methods that clearly advance our understanding of anomalous experiences and the historical and social cultural matrix in which they are embedded

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Anomalous monism and epiphenomenalism.Rex Welshon - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
The argument for anomalous monism.Ted Honderich - 1982 - Analysis 42 (January):59-64.
Psi: Anomalous correlation or anomalous explanation?Peter Railton - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):605.
Refining the explanation of cotard's delusion.Philip Gerrans - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (1):111-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-19

Downloads
1 (#1,900,366)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references